{"id":3739,"date":"2020-06-18T15:11:30","date_gmt":"2020-06-18T15:11:30","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/columbiagradunion.org\/?p=3739"},"modified":"2020-06-18T15:11:30","modified_gmt":"2020-06-18T15:11:30","slug":"week-of-6-15-bargaining-and-covid-19-updates-from-the-table","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/columbiagradunion.org\/2020\/06\/18\/week-of-6-15-bargaining-and-covid-19-updates-from-the-table\/","title":{"rendered":"Week of 6\/15: Bargaining and COVID-19 Updates from the Table"},"content":{"rendered":"
On Monday, June 15, the Bargaining Committee resumed negotiations with Columbia University over the first collective bargaining agreement and the unit’s position on safety and workload issues that continue to unfold as a result of COVID-19 emergency measures taken by the administration. The following summarizes our position and Columbia’s responses on both fronts.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n Safety and Workload Issues\u00a0<\/b><\/p>\n Columbia’s Responses<\/b><\/p>\n The university’s response does not fully address the issues raised by members. But, also, no student workers are involved in the task forces making decisions about our well being. Adding workers to these task forces would expedite and improve their decision-making and communication. Our contract includes a joint health and safety committee, making it all the more important that we pressure Colubmia to bargain in good faith.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n <\/p>\n Bargaining Update\u00a0<\/b><\/p>\n We mainly discussed <\/span>Appointments, Job Posting, Union Access, Grievance and Arbitration, and International Student Workers Rights.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n We inched toward agreement on Appointments and <\/span>International Student Workers Rights. <\/span>Columbia offered new language about working together to assist international students trying to return to Columbia. The university also made slight adjustments on their No Strike\/No Lockout and Union Access article. <\/span>However: Their Grievance and Arbitration proposal still includes multiple provisions that, by his own admission, are informed by the experience of the Proskauer Rose attorney representing the university at the bargaining table.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n Instead of establishing a process that stands on the merit of the arguments brought to an arbitrator, Columbia’s Grievances proposal is meant to block decisions that the university\u00a0 considers to be in conflict with its management rights and academic purview. Columbia also continues to insist on carving out cases of harassment in order to have them adjudicated by Columbia’s EOAA division\u2014despite new Title IX regulations, which prioritize protecting the accused. In the same spirit, Columbia again refused to commit to an expected weekly workload in appointment letters based on the claim that providing an estimate would invite grievances\u2014even though departments provide estimates already and both sides acknowledge a maximum workweek.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n We understand that Columbia’s team is bargaining on behalf of the administration’s interests but we expect proposals with a reasonable rationale rather than an attorney’s speculation about working with a student worker unit. Columbia is again showing its anti-worker stripes and willingness to drain resources from the university’s academic mission even while calling on others to make sacrifices.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n That Columbia’s proposals reflect the university’s refusal to take into account interests of workers should surprise no one. Columbia is an employer and, like any employer, will act accordingly. Our university should be an exception rather than yet another example of this.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" On Monday, June 15, the Bargaining Committee resumed negotiations with Columbia University over the first collective bargaining agreement and the unit’s position on safety and workload issues that continue to unfold as a result of COVID-19 emergency measures taken by<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[17,21,5,4],"tags":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/columbiagradunion.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3739"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/columbiagradunion.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/columbiagradunion.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/columbiagradunion.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/columbiagradunion.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3739"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/columbiagradunion.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3739\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":3740,"href":"https:\/\/columbiagradunion.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3739\/revisions\/3740"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/columbiagradunion.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3739"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/columbiagradunion.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3739"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/columbiagradunion.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3739"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}\n
\n
\n
\n